Because of GPS devices, thieves, drug dealers, sexual predators and killers have already been captured, often without a warrant or court order. As one would expect, privacy advocates argue that tracking suspects electronically constitutes illegal search and seizure and violates Fourth Amendment rights of protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that this is another step toward George Orwell's Big Brother vision.
Law enforcement officials, when they discuss the issue at all, say GPS is essentially the same as having an officer trail someone, just cheaper and more accurate. Most of the time, judges have sided with the police. Advocates of GPS explain that the police have no need to obtain a warrant to track suspects electronically on public streets because the device provides the same information as physical tracking. According to Attorney Richard E. Trodden, "A police officer could do the same thing with his or her own eyes. It helps to cut down on the number of police officers who would have to be out tracking particular vehicles." As further evidence of its effectiveness, FBI agents successfully used a GPS device while investigating an embezzlement scheme to steal from District taxpayers, attaching one to a suspect's Jaguar.
You may want to note that on December 10, 2010, the US Air Force celebrated the GPS satellite's 20th year in orbit. It remains under the purview of the US Air Force and has become critical to the American infrastructure for use by the government, private business and the general public. We now have 31 satellites in the GPS constellation.
The U.S. Supreme Court has not weighed in on unwarranted GPS tracking, but supporters point to a 1983 case that said police do not need a warrant to track a car on a public street with a beeper, which relays the car's location to police. Lower courts that have addressed the issue have not all agreed. The Washington state Supreme Court has ruled that police must obtain a warrant to use the device in that manner, but courts in New York, Wisconsin and Maryland, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in Chicago, have held that a warrant is not essential.
With the ever-declining cost of the technology and the courts' blessing, many analysts believe that police will increasingly rely on GPS as an effective tool in investigations and that the public will hear little about the issue.
You have read the best review article categorized by real estate attorney
and the title Speaking Of Secret Weapons. You can bookmark or spread this post by using this URL https://realestateattorney-tips.blogspot.com/2013/02/speaking-of-secret-weapons.html. Thank You!
Comments :
0 comments to “Speaking Of Secret Weapons”
Post a Comment